It links individual claims and indicators to source scope and limitations. A bibliography primarily identifies documents; the register explains how each document is being used.
Source basis: 1. Scientific data · 2. PLoS medicine · 3. BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Use a claim-level record
A bibliography tells readers which documents were consulted. A source register goes further by identifying which statement each source supports. For an indicator, record units, denominator, population, geography and measurement period. For a qualitative finding, record whose account was collected and in which setting. STROBE provides a reporting lens for observational evidence; FAIR supports the identifiers and provenance needed to trace the record.
Preserve the difference between evidence and application
A source may describe one programme or population while a policy proposal concerns another. The MRC framework makes context and implementation questions explicit. Store the proposed application in a separate field with its assumptions. This prevents a local interpretation from being silently presented as the original study’s conclusion. Unknown cost, coverage or acceptability information should remain visible rather than filled with a confident estimate.
An editorial working example
For an accessibility policy brief, an analyst could create separate rows for an administrative service count, an interview study and a published evaluation. The first might describe volume, the second experience and the third an outcome under a specified design. Their roles in the decision differ even when all concern the same service. Record that distinction before writing the executive summary.
| Focus | What to document | Interpretation question or limit |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence identity | Stable identifier, source link and version | Can the source be located? |
| Scope | Population, method, place and period | Does it match the proposed use? |
| Decision interpretation | Assumptions, uncertainty and reviewer notes | Which reasoning belongs to the institution? |
Limitations and unresolved questions
A register improves traceability but does not replace critical appraisal or establish that a policy option is effective. Sensitive interpretations may require specialist review.
Implications for research and institutions
Keep the register with the brief and update it when a value, source release or interpretation changes. Preserve the original entry so a correction can be understood later.
Research question
How is a source register different from a bibliography?
It links individual claims and indicators to source scope and limitations. A bibliography primarily identifies documents; the register explains how each document is being used.
Verified source bibliography
- Wilkinson MD; Dumontier M; Aalbersberg IJ et al. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship.. Scientific data · DOI
- von Elm E; Altman DG; Egger M et al. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.. PLoS medicine · DOI
- Skivington K; Matthews L; Simpson SA et al. (2021). A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · DOI
Methodological guidance is distinguished from empirical autism research. Links and relevant source content were checked on 2026-10-27. Citation is not endorsement or affiliation. Follow the source for its full scope, rights and limitations.